Opposition chief urges world to act on #Syria

Ahmed Moaz al-Khatib

Syria’s opposition chief Ahmed Moaz al-Khatib on Saturday slammed world governments for failing to act to stop the bloodshed in Syria, nearly two years into a war that has left some 70,000 people dead.

Khatib made the remarks as he took part in Cairo in a demonstration which he described as “a message of protest to all governments of the world, Arab and non-Arab, that can see how the Syrian people are being killed, while they merely look on.”

“All the administrations of the world can see what is happening… We cannot visit any country until there is a clear decision on this savage, aggressive regime,” Khatib told the Dubai-based Al-Aan pan-Arab television in Cairo.

On Friday the opposition coalition said it will boycott an upcoming Friends of Syria meeting in Rome and cancelled planned visits to Washington and Moscow citing the “shameful” inaction of the international community.

The opposition wants world governments to turn into action their statements of support for the uprising against the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and are also seeking military assistance for rebels fighting the regime.

The UN Security Council has been blocked from acting on Syria by Russian and Chinese vetoes, while Western powers have become more hesitant to help the armed opposition to Assad’s regime for fear of the rise of radical Islamist groups.

Earlier, National Coalition spokesman Walid al-Bunni told France 24’s Arabic-language channel that the United States must honor promises of support for democracy in Syria.

“Our visit to Washington is on hold until Washington takes a stance that is in accordance with US statements on its support for democracy,” Bunni said.

“The United States is a leading force in the world, as are France, Britain and the European Union. All these have been unable to stop a butcher from committing massacres against our people,” he said, referring to Assad.

“We cannot continue listening to statements that are not accompanied by action… The world has a responsibility to protect [the Syrian people] from a butcher who has been slaughtering them for two years,” Bunni added.

02/23/2013

General Mood: Weapons are speaking in Syria

Major General Mood, the Norwegian soldier who was in charge of UN monitors in Syria between April and July this year, has said it is “the weapons who are speaking” in Syria.

He told the World at One that “anyone feeding the violence with money or weapons should consider very carefully whether this brings us closer or further away from less violence and more dialogue.”

“The international community may actually prolong the suffering of Syrian people,” he added.

PLEASE CLICK HERE TO HEAR AUDIO OF GENERAL MOOD’S INTERVIEW!
http://checknews.net/en/a.php?id=180336&utm_source=Check+News+En&utm_medium=twitter&utm_term=news

26/08/12

Is #Syria in a state of civil war?

As fighting escalates, we ask why the international community is reluctant to call the conflict a civil war.

As Syrian government forces intensify attacks from the air and on the ground aimed at stamping out opposition strongholds from Aleppo and elsewhere, the world is asking whether or not Syria is in a state of civil war.

Any change in status of the conflict would mean combatants would be subjects to the Geneva Conventions, potentially allowing prosecutions for war crimes.

In July, the International Committee of the Red Cross described the fighting in Syria as a civil war. A month before, Herve Ladsous, the UN’s head of peacekeeping also said the country was in a state of civil war.

Syrian authorities say speaking about civil war in the country contradicts reality - all the while inside the country civilians continue to pay a heavy price as the battles continue to claim thousands of lives.

Zeina Khodr, reporting from Aleppo, says: “The areas where the opposition has set up base have been coming under heavy bombardment. More often than not the civilians who remain here are the ones who are getting killed and injured. The shelling and strikes have been described as indiscriminate.”

So, what is the definition of a civil war? What changes when a conflict is officially declared a civil war? Is Syria in a state of civil war? And if so, why is the international community reluctant to say so?

Inside Syria, with presenter Stephen Cole, discusses with guests: Rafif Jouejati, a Syrian opposition activist and a spokeswoman for the Syrian Local Coordination Committee; Nadim Shehadi, an associate fellow at the Middle East and North Africa Programme at Chatham House; and Yusuf Kanli, a columnist and former editor of the Turkish Hurriyet Daily News.

“We reject the label of civil war, because we go back to how this revolution started: with peaceful protests – and they continue throughout the country, every day, every week, in every governorate. Now the Assad regime has forced the militarisation of the revolution, but he in fact himself has declared a war against his people. I would call this a humanitarian war against the Syrian people.”

- Rafif Jouejati, a Syrian Local Coordination Committee spokeswoman

CONSTITUTES OF CIVIL WAR:

  • It is a high-intensity conflict between organised groups within the same nation state or Republic
  • The aim of one side may be to take control of the country or a region
  • Another category of a civil war is involving regular armed forces, which are sustained, organised and large-scale
  • Large numbers of casualties and the consumption of significant resources would also constitute a civil war
  • The 1949 Geneva Conventions lays out the rules of war
  • The ICRC will hold the combatants involved accountable to the Geneva conventions and this means that both sides of the conflict, the Syrian government and the opposition, could be prosecuted by the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity

THE SITUATION IN SYRIA: 

  • UN: More than 17,000 people were killed in Syria since the start of unrest
  • 200,000 Syrian refugees are registered in Turkey, Jordan, Lebanon and Iraq
  • The Turkish government says 66,000 Syrian refugees are now in Turkey
  • UN humanitarian chief Valerie Amos: Up to 2,5 million people need aid in Syria
  • Over a million people displaced inside Syria because of fighting
  • Ban Ki-moon wants to set up a UN ‘political office’ in Syria
  • The UN decided not to extend the mandate of its observer mission
  • Many including a former PM and military generals have defected
France urges partial no-fly zone in #Syria

23/08/12

The international community should consider enforcing a no-fly zone over parts of Syria, France’s defence minister said.

Jean-Yves Le Drian said completely closing Syria’s airspace was equivalent to “going to war” and would require a willing international coalition that does not yet exist.

The minister, however, told television station France 24 today that France would participate in such an operation if it followed international legal principles.

For now, though, he suggested that a partial closure – which US secretary of state Hillary Clinton said Washington was considering – should be studied.

France, like other Western countries, is sending supplies to the rebels fighting Syrian president Bashar Assad, but the international community has been reluctant to intervene in the conflict as it did in Libya.

New Syria envoy voices hope for diplomacy
UN-Arab League envoy Lakhdar Brahimi says the international community cannot afford to turn its back on Syria.

Last Modified: 18 Aug 2012 10:28

The United Nations has confirmed that veteran Algerian diplomat Lakhdar Brahimi will become the new international mediator on Syria.

Talking to Al Jazeera, Brahimi said he was convinced that diplomacy could still play a real role in solving the Syrian conflict, which the opposition says has claimed more than 20,000 lives since the anti-government uprising began in March last year.

“I don’t know if there’s any conflict that hasn’t ended with some kind of negotiation, with some kind of diplomatic phase,” he said.

Brahimi, who hesitated for days to accept a job that France’s UN envoy Gerard Araud called an “impossible mission”,
will replace former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, who is stepping down at the end of the month.

The new envoy said the international community cannot afford to turn its back on the war-torn country.

“The UN, and I suppose the Arab League as well, simply cannot just say ‘this is a difficult job, let’s look away’,” Brahimi said.

“I suppose I’m vain enough to think that with the little experience I have, if I’m asked to try and do something in a situation like this, I cannot say no, even if I’m deeply, deeply aware of the difficulty I am facing.

“We will go into this with a lot of good will, a lot of determination, but a lot of humility as well.”

Experienced mediator

Brahimi, a Nobel Peace laureate, has vast experience of handling conflict-stricken states

He was a UN envoy in Afghanistan before and after the September 11, 2001 attacks, and in Iraq after the 2003 invasion.

Representing the Arab League, Brahimi helped end the Lebanese civil war in the 1980s, negotiating with the Syrian government of the time.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and Arab League chief Nabil Elaraby back Brahimi’s appointment, UN spokesman Eduardo del Buey said, adding that achieving a diplomatic solution to the Syrian crisis remained a top priority for the UN.

“The [UN] secretary-general appreciates Mr Brahimi’s willingness to bring his considerable talents and experience to
this crucial task for which he will need, and rightly expects, the strong, clear and unified support of the international community, including the Security Council,” .

Diplomats said all Security Council members supported the appointment of Brahimi.

UN officials said he was expected to arrive in New York next week to meet Ban and discuss plans for a fresh approach to Syria.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton endorsed Brahimi as the new international envoy.

“My message to Special Envoy Brahimi is simple: The United States stands ready to support you and secure a lasting peace that upholds the legitimate aspirations for a representative government of the people of Syria,” she said.

Britain said it “fully supports” Brahimi’s appointment, welcoming the “vast experience” he brought to the role of seeking a political solution to the violence.

Poor substitute #Syria

Diplomat Lakhdar Brahimi speaks with former U.S. President Jimmy Carter (not pictured) during a joint news conference in Khartoum in this May 27, 2012 file photo. (REUTERS/Mohamed Nureldin  Abdallah)

Diplomat Lakhdar Brahimi speaks with former U.S. President Jimmy Carter (not pictured) during a joint news conference in Khartoum in this May 27, 2012 file photo. (REUTERS/Mohamed Nureldin Abdallah)

11/08/2012

The less time spent discussing the news that a replacement for Kofi Annan is going to be made, the better.

But for now, the media will be obliged to deal with the news that Algerian diplomat Lakhdar Brahimi is being considered for the post, and then likely cover the official announcement of the appointment.

The “news,” as such, boils down to this: Annan’s mandate as the United Nations-Arab League envoy to Syria will elapse on the 20th of this month, so if Brahimi is actually selected, he will only serve for a short interval – much more pressing is the question of whether the post itself is renewed.

The move to actually consider appointing a successor to Annan appears to be designed to appease Moscow, and it’s another sign of the failure of the U.N. and the international community. The world’s leading powers are searching for a way to avoid coming up with a solution, if asking Brahimi to step in is what’s on the table.

People will inevitably use shorthand to refer to Brahimi as a veteran diplomat, with a track record of being selected to handle various “hot spots,” such as Haiti, Iraq and Afghanistan, for example. But would a special envoy ever be named to a place that isn’t a hot spot?

In fact, Brahimi’s record is one of disappointment. He’s the perfect public servant, as he is adept in standing before microphones and making upbeat statements that usually bear little relation to reality.

He has never been particularly creative or energetic in his missions, instead preferring to tell each side what it wants to hear, as his shuttle trips continue, along with the crisis in question.

The Lebanese have their own special memory of Brahimi during the final phases of the Civil War. He had excellent contacts with all sides, and spent his time shuttling between East and West Beirut, never managing to bring about the elusive cease-fire. The Taif Accord was not a Brahimi initiative; he was just the messenger for the arrangement that finally ended the war.

If experience in moving from one waste of time to another is the qualification for continuing Annan’s mission in Syria, Brahimi is perfectly suited for the job.

Annan’s mission died because every side’s stance was well known, and held no hope of a solution for the Syrian crisis. Since the U.N. envoy was named, several thousand people have been killed, and the Syrian public has become certain that the U.N. does not intend to take any serious action to end the bloodshed.

Neither side should welcome Brahimi, if he is tasked with picking up where Annan left off, unless someone, somewhere, makes it clear that the international community believes the crisis in Syria must be solved, and immediately. Otherwise, Brahimi will only have a rising body count to remember from his tenure.

Pak supports #Syria, opposes foreign action, says Khar

11/08/2012

ISLAMABAD: Ending months of ambiguity over the crisis in Syria, Pakistan joined the group of countries supporting the Syrian government on Friday and warned against foreign interference and military intervention in the 17-month-old conflict.

Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar was one of the three foreign ministers who attended an international consultative meeting on the Syrian crisis hosted by Iran.

“It is our considered view that any outside intervention would further complicate an already very complex situation. It must be avoided,” Khar said at the conference attended by about 25 countries, most of who were represented at ambassadorial level.

She urged the international community to respect Syria’s sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity.

Besides Pakistan, representatives from Russia, China, Belarus, Mauritania, Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, Georgia, Turkmenistan, Benin, Sri  Lanka, Ecuador, Afghanistan, Algeria, Iraq, Zimbabwe, Oman, Venezuela, Tajikistan, India, Kazakhstan, Armenia, Nicaragua, Cuba, Sudan,  Jordan, Tunisia and Palestine attended the conference.

Western countries backing rebels had dismissed the Tehran meeting as an attempt to divert world attention from the bloody events in Syria where pro-government troops are fighting pitched battles against rebel forces in Aleppo and other parts of the war-torn country.

The West has accused Iran of broadening support for embattled President Bashar Al Assad by holding the conference.

“Syria needs political space to find a peaceful solution and reestablish its societal equilibrium by engaging all sides. Syria must forge its own destiny in accordance with the aspirations of its people,” Khar said.

Internews

#Syria: Any foreign attackers may face chemical weapons

Beirut— Syria threatened Monday to unleash its chemical and biological weapons if the country faces a foreign attack, a desperate warning from a regime that has failed to crush a powerful and strengthening rebellion.

The statement — Syria’s first-ever acknowledgement that the country possesses weapons of mass destruction — suggests President Bashar Assad will continue the fight to stay in power, regardless of the cost.

“It would be reprehensible if anybody in Syria is contemplating use of such weapons of mass destruction like chemical weapons,” U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said during a trip to Belgrade, Serbia. “I sincerely hope the international community will keep an eye on this so that there will be no such things happening.”

Syria is believed to have nerve agents as well as mustard gas, Scud missiles capable of delivering these lethal chemicals and a variety of advanced conventional arms.

During a televised news conference Monday, Foreign Ministry spokesman Jihad Makdissi stressed that the weapons are secure and would only be used in the case of an external attack.

“No chemical or biological weapons will ever be used, and I repeat, will never be used, during the crisis in Syria no matter what the developments inside Syria,” he said. “All of these types of weapons are in storage and under security and the direct supervision of the Syrian armed forces and will never be used unless Syria is exposed to external aggression.”

The Syrian government later tried to back off from the announcement, issuing an amendment to the prepared statement read by Makdissi.

In his comments to reporters, Makdissi also repeated the regime’s assertion that the country’s 17-month-old conflict is the work of foreign extremists looking to destroy the nation.

Israel and the U.S. are concerned that Syria’s stockpile of chemical weapons could fall into the hands of Islamist militants should the regime collapse. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned Sunday that his country would “have to act” if necessary to safeguard the arsenal from rogue elements.

(13/07/2012) #Syria - Speech by Brigadier General Ahmed Barre in response to the Tremseh massacre (with translation):

RIP our martyrs , the  dignity and freedom martyrs.
Brave men, all the heroes  of  syria ..  the time for delays have expired. We should all be in a united field of action. The criminal corrupted regime has gotten deeper and deeper in killings and destruction. Its crimes  cover all of Syria and has extended to neighbouring countries, using  all kinds of murderous equipment:  aviation , artilleries, tanks and using the internationally prohibited, cluster weapons against unarmed civilians .
I appeal to the international community and say: enough delays, you  should  take a  decisive resolution  under  chapter  7  point  42  that allows  military  action and NFZ ,or leave us, and god will be with us.
countries that  are  supporting  the regime are the killers of our people, headed by Russia that is supporting the regime with weapons and international positions.
We say to the whole  world, aren’t these massacres enough ?! And finally, regarding the Treysseh massacre which was committed by (regime gangs) regime shabiha that resulted in the killing of innocent people, women and children .
We confirm  that FSA  wasn’t present in this  village, and if there would be anyone from the FSA, the regime  would not dare commit this massacre .
 I promise  all  people and the FSA, that we will avenge our martyrs  and our people  and you will see, god willing, what will relieve your hearts (  good news ) .
I  appeal  to my military brothers  who are standing in a foggy position, to act according to their conscience. The victims are their people. I ask, people who are abroad and inside syria to join the FSA. Enough of being afraid and hesitant.
We  confirm  to  our people  that we will have no mercy  for those who are killing our people no matter who they are.
 
 
 
Translated by: Syrian Freedom Livestream

Venezuelan diesel shipments to #Syria fuel controversy

President Hugo Chavez and the country's state-run oil company have defended fuel shipments to Syria.

President Hugo Chavez and the country’s state-run oil company have defended fuel shipments to Syria.


Caracas, Venezuela (CNN) — While many world leaders have condemned Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, the embattled leader has found an ally in Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez.

The South American country’s state-run oil company has sent large diesel shipments to Syria, despite international sanctions.

In recent months, Venezuela supplied Syria with at least three shipments of diesel fuel in exchange for Syrian naphtha, a refined petroleum product, according to a May report from the U.S. Congressional Research Service.

In late May, Syria’s oil minister said that an oil tanker loaded with 35,000 tons of diesel fuel had arrived in his country from Venezuela, the state-run Syrian Arab News Agency reported. At the time, he said Venezuela was preparing another tanker to head to Syria.

Citing Venezuelan and Syrian government documents, the Wall Street Journal reported this week that a fourth shipment was in the works. CNN has not independently confirmed that report.


“If they need diesel, and we can provide it, there is no reason not to do it,” Rafael Ramirez, Venezuela’s energy minister, told reporters in February, according to state media reports.Chavez and the president of Venezuela’s state-run oil company have defended their sovereign right to send fuel to Syria.

Ramirez, who also heads the state-run oil company, said Venezuela was not worried about possibly facing international sanctions for sending fuel to the Middle Eastern nation.

“We cannot determine our foreign policy with fear of U.S. sanctions,” he said. “We have said that those truly don’t matter to us.”

Chavez and al-Assad have a “longstanding personal fraternity,” Venezuela’s foreign ministry said in a statement after the two leaders spoke on the phone in April.

This week, Chavez criticized what he said was Washington’s imperialistic approach to Syria.

“They should be focusing on solving their own country’s problems, but they want to impose themselves, like they did in Libya, where they killed thousands and thousands of people to then kill (Libyan leader) Moammar Gadhafi, and now they want to do the same with Syria and they are also threatening Iran,” he said, according to state-run VTV.

In March, Venezuela’s parliament passed “an agreement in solidarity with Syria in light of the imperial threat presented by the United States and its Arab allies.”

“The document exhorts the international community and peace lovers to undertake a massive campaign to reject intervention in that nation,” Venezuela’s interior ministry said.

Critics have alleged that fuel sent by Venezuela has been used to maintain the Syrian government’s military operations.

Otto Reich, a U.S. assistant secretary of state during President George W. Bush’s administration and a fierce critic of Chavez, told Venezuela’s El Universal newspaper last month that he feared ships sending fuel could have a more nefarious purpose.

“Chavez uses his own vessels because no self-respecting international shipping firm will transport fuel to Assad’s killing machine. There is another advantage, however: since he controls the entire voyage, from dock to dock, Chavez may be sending Assad military material hidden in the ships,” he said.

Alberto Aranguibel, a political analyst in Caracas who supports Chavez, told CNN en Español Tuesday that the fuel shipments are an economic and humanitarian matter.

U.S. sanctions against Syria must be stopped, he said.

“There is a humanitarian reason. The blockade is arbitrary, illegal and illegitimate. … It doesn’t affect the government. It affects the people,” he said.

Mauricio Meschoulam, an international relations professor in Mexico City, told CNN en Español that Venezuela was one of many nations that had become involved in the Syrian crisis.

“They are, unfortunately, feeding the parties that are clashing,” he said.

U.S. sanctions in Syria and Venezuela’s attempts to defy them are part of a global geopolitical battle, he said.

“There are no good or evil (countries). They are all fighting for resources, each one searching for its piece of the pie,” he said.

The close relationship between Venezuela and Syria has been years in the making.

After signing several agreements with al-Assad on an October 2010 trip to Syria, Chavez said the country’s capitals “have become the poles of the new world.”

“We are obligated to weave the connections between Damascus and Caracas with threads of steel … new economic, political, agricultural and scientific relations much strengthen so we can overcome together the great challenges that the times we live in impose,” Chavez said.

Violence erupted in Syria in March 2011, when Syrian forces launched a brutal crackdown on anti-government demonstrations, part of the Arab Spring that swept through several countries. Syrian officials have regularly blamed “armed terrorist groups” for the clashes.

The United Nations says more than 10,000 people, mostly civilians, have been killed in the violence. Opposition groups give an even higher figure.

CNN cannot independently confirm reports of violence in Syria, as the country’s government has severely limited the access of international journalists.

CNN’s Catherine E. Shoichet, CNN en Español’s Fernando del Rincon and journalist Osmary Hernandez contributed to this report.

Ousted priest committed to peace in #Syria

Rome-born Jesuit is infuriated by the perception among many Christians that an Assad ouster would lead to an Islamist takeover and ill-treatment of minorities.

Father Paolo Dall’Oglio talks to a visitor in the courtyard of the restored Byzantine Monastery Deir Mar Musa al Habashi (St. Moses the Abyssinian). (Louai Beshara, AFP/Getty Images / July 11, 2007)


BEIRUT — Resplendent in black cassock and matching skullcap, the bearded Jesuit appears in a YouTube video breaking bread with opposition activists and donating blood at a makeshift rebel clinic, highlighting his solidarity with the Syrian rebellion.

But Father Paolo Dall’Oglio, a brawny bear of a man who enunciates each word with a theatrical sense of certitude, scoffs at the “jihad priest” label. He says he remains committed to a peaceful resolution of the conflict in his adopted homeland — a “jihad of the spirit, not a jihad of arms,” as he declared during a recent stay in the rebel-occupied Syrian town of Qusair.

Still, the Italian-born priest warns: “If nonviolence becomes another name for a lack of responsibility, then I am not with nonviolence anymore. I am with the right to defend people.”

Talk like that helped get Dall’Oglio expelled from Syria last month after 30 years in Syria, where his devotion to Christian-Muslim “harmony” earned him a global following as a charismatic and pugnacious interfaith visionary.

The outspoken cleric says he was “kicked out” by church authorities acting on demands from the Syrian government, enraged by his strident pronouncements backing the 16-month uprising against President Bashar Assad.

He evinces little sympathy for fellow Christians who fear Assad’s fall could unleash an era of Islamist repression.

“They are in a state of Islamophobia,” Dall’Oglio says of Syrian Christians still loyal to a fraying police state that has throttled dissent but tolerated religious minorities for more than four decades. “From the 1980s, all they’ve heard, repeated and repeated, is that without the Assad state, Syria would be an Islamic hell.”

The Dall’Oglio imbroglio provides a window onto the parlous position of Syria’s Christians, who trace their origins in Syria to pre-Islamic times but now represent perhaps 10% of the nation’s 23 million people, the great majority of whom are Sunni Muslims. Christians are generally counted as pillars of support for the secular Assad administration.

The priest is plainly infuriated by the perception among many Christians that Assad’s ouster would lead to an Islamist takeover that could trigger a backlash against minorities.

“How can we as Christians go with the lies of the regime and stick with the confessional complicity in renouncing the specificity of the Gospel, renouncing the fight for human dignity and freedom?” he asks.

In an “open letter” to United Nations special envoy Kofi Annan, Dall’Oglio lays out, in rambling, ornate prose, his case for massive, nonviolent intervention: 3,000 unarmed observers and 30,000 civilian peacekeepers deployed in Syria to help “initiate a widespread start of grass-roots level democratic life.”

It is a characteristically grandiose submission from the flamboyant Jesuit, and probably an unrealistic one, given the constraints of diplomacy and the extreme peril that forced the U.N. to pull back its comparatively minuscule 300-member unarmed observer mission in Syria. But Dall’Oglio is a guy who likes to think big, leading some Christians, and others, to call him naive, trusting too much in the opposition pledges of tolerance.

“The game includes players bigger than him,” says one Christian activist close to the situation in Syria.

The now-exiled priest, speaking from a Jesuit residence in Beirut after his expulsion from Syria, sounds a stern plea for peaceful foreign intervention in the nation to avert what he calls a looming humanitarian catastrophe.

“The question is: Is the international community mature enough to show and affirm full responsibility toward a situation like Syria?” asks the 57-year-old cleric, who argues that Syria is sliding into an abyss of communal slaughter and even partition.

Assad, he says, must go.

“They can receive him and his family in Russia,” Dall’Oglio says. “People are the issue, not dictators.

“What is pitiful is that there are conditions for massive killings, and ‘ethnic cleansing,’ and all of the awful things that we have seen in Bosnia, for instance.”

A native of Rome, Dall’Oglio says he developed an interest in Islam as a young man, specialized in Oriental studies and arrived as a priest in Syria 30 years ago. He founded a center for interreligious dialogue in a restored Byzantine monastery, Deir Mar Musa al Habashi (St. Moses the Abyssinian), situated in a breathtaking cliff-side desert site and featuring restored 11th and 12th century frescoes.

The monastery became a kind of fixture on the offbeat, spiritual-tourism circuit, though the conflict has cut off the once-steady flow of foreign visitors whose contributions helped sustain the place.

In February, Dall’Oglio says, 30 masked gunmen stormed the monastery, demanding, “Where are the weapons!” They left after trashing some equipment, but no one was injured, Dall’Oglio says.

Today, his call for interfaith dialogue seems more urgent than ever. He allows no trace of a smile, saying there is nothing to smile about.

The ethnic cleansing of Syria has already begun, warns Dall’Oglio. But he insists that it is a project of the Assad government, not an objective of the Sunni-led guerrilla forces that have inspired such misgivings among Christians and other Syrian minorities, including Assad’s Alawite sect, an offshoot of Shiite Islam.

“The regime is already acting in the logic of division of the country,” says Dall’Oglio, citing rumors of contingency plans for an Alawite-run rump state carved from the Mediterranean shore to the Orontes River. “What do you do with most of the Sunni population? They have started to kill them, massively.”

Syrian authorities deny such allegations linking government-backed shabiha militias to mass killings in towns such as Houla, where more than 100 people, mostly women and children, were killed in late May. Each side in the Syria conflict inevitably blames the other for the almost-daily litany of massacres.

The monk’s next stop on his Christian-Muslim harmony mission is the Kurdish region of Iraq, a nation whose recent history underscores the thorny relationship between political liberation and religious tolerance.

The U.S-.led ouster of another secular autocrat, Saddam Hussein, unleashed a civil war between Sunnis and Shiites, along with church-bombings and other assaults targeting Iraq’s Christian minority. It is the fervent hope of Dall’Oglio that the Christians of Syria will not face the same fate.

patrick.mcdonnell@latimes.com

Special correspondent Rima Marrouch contributed to this report.
Clinton Says #Syria Must End Violence To Avoid ‘Catastrophic Assault’

A member of the Free Syrian Army walks past a destroyed government tank in the town of Atareb in northern Aleppo province.

Analysis: #Syria options dwindling

Analysis: Syria options dwindling

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius listen during a meeting of the “Friends of the Syrian People” at the MFA Conference Center July 6, 2012 in Paris, France.


By Elise Labott

When the Friends of Syria group began meeting this year, first in Tunis and again in Istanbul, there was a sense of possibility. Perhaps the group would endorse military action against Syria. Maybe they would recognize the Syrian National Council as the legitimate opposition group.

Six months in, the allure has worn off. At their third meeting in Paris, there were no expectations any decisions would be made, except for who would host the next meeting.

Calls were made for tougher sanctions against President Bashar al-Assad’s regime, even though most countries which had any business with Syria have already imposed tough measures to no avail.

The group did endorse a transition plan hatched last week in Geneva. The document endorses a Syrian-led transition as part of the peace plan designed by U.N.-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan. The fact that the plan, which provides for an interim government, has no relation to the current reality on the ground or that it had no input from either the Syrian regime or the opposition - the two parties which would have to implement it - didn’t seem to be nearly as important as the fact that Russia and China went along with it.

In lieu of an agenda, there was plenty of blame in Paris to heap on Russia and China. Offering her harshest rebuke of Moscow and Beijing to date, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called on each leader present at the meeting to demand that Syria “get off the sidelines.”

“I don’t believe Russia and China believe they are paying any price at all, nothing at all for standing up on behalf of the Assad regime,” Clinton said.

The longer the conflict drags on, the tougher Clinton’s rhetoric on Russia becomes.

By placing the blame squarely on Russia and China, Clinton and others are able to delude themselves that diplomatic efforts can end the conflict with the main goal of getting Assad out. But in their heart of hearts they know even the most detailed roadmap of a post-Assad Syria has no hope of changing the military balance on the ground enough so that the Syrian military, Assad’s inner circle, and Moscow see Assad as a sinking ship and abandon him.

Diplomats in New York are already at work on a new U.N. Security Council resolution endorsing the Annan plan and imposing sanctions on the regime if it fails to implement it. The resolution would be under Chapter 7, which has the implied threat of military action.

But this, too, is a mirage. Privately, U.S. and other western officials recognize they are spinning their wheels. They know there is no chance the Assad regime would implement the Annan plan without a credible military threat and they also know that the appetite for international military action is, well, nonexistent.

Since the conflict in Syria began, the international community has had many excuses for inaction: the lack of a credible opposition, Russian intransigence and the fear of further militarizing the conflict. The need to give Annan’s peace plan time to work was just the latest justification.

Riad Seif, a prominent businessman and former member of parliament who recently left Syria and is now a member of the opposition, gave voice to what many Syrians are feeling about the futility of the “Friends of Syria” exercise when he asked the group to make its friendship actually mean something.

“After so many conferences, we fail to see how we have so many friends and people are dying every day,” he told the group during a fiery address. “Help us put an end to this massacre.”

#Syria’s Kurds can be persuaded to revolt

July 06, 2012 12:49 AM By Ali EzzatyarThe Daily Star

When it nominated Abdulbaset Sieda as its leader a few weeks ago, the Syrian National Council acknowledged what otherwise should have been obvious to everyone from the start: The Kurds can make all the difference in shaping the outcome of the Syrian uprising.

But it is not the SNC or any other group in Syria that is likely to force the Kurds off the fence. Kurdish apathy is a reflection of something more profound. The 20 million Kurds in Turkey have always been the cultural and political trendsetters for the 2 million or so Kurds living in Syria. If Syria’s fate is indeed determined by the behavior of its Kurdish minority, then Turkey’s Kurds will likely play a role.

Kurds make up 10 percent of the Syrian population, but they are a unique 10 percent. They are predominantly Sunni, and not being Arab they have been especially disregarded by the Assad regime. They are also a group that, while conservative, has not developed a strong Islamist contingent. As a large, unaligned minority in the midst of revolution, the Kurds are the equivalent of a swing-vote in Syria.

Syria’s late president, Hafez Assad, was once the primary backer of Turkey’s outlawed Kurdistan Workers Party, or PKK, in its war against the Turkish Republic. That war has claimed almost 40,0000 lives, most of them during the 1990s. Turkish diplomatic and military pressure eventually forced Syria’s regime to relinquish most of its support for the PKK. However, Damascus has maintained ties to Kurdish separatists over the last decade, while suppressing its own smaller, less politicized Kurdish population. Still, Kurds in Syria and Turkey alike view Turkey, not Syria, as their main adversary. Isolated fighting between the PKK and the Turkish armed forces continues until today, and the PKK periodically threatens to renew all-out war.

So it is no surprise that although Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has ramped up pressure on Syria in the last six months, the Turkish government is loath to go too far in its support for the Syrian opposition. Erdogan recognizes that Assad has a wild card in Turkey’s Kurds, who continue to be denied their basic rights. The prime minister also knows that by mobilizing the tools at his disposal to effect change in Syria, he will be playing with fire at home.

This dichotomy represents a failure of the international community. Over the course of the last decade, Turkey has progressed in almost every measurable way toward a vibrant, prosperous society. But this has failed to translate into new openings on the Kurdish question. Many states, focused on the specter of Islamism and distracted by wars and uprisings in the Middle East, have failed to push Turkey to make meaningful reforms with respect to its Kurdish minority.

The repercussions of this failed policy are significant. Even though we are 18 months into the Syria uprising, the Kurds have been largely uninterested in taking sides. They view their struggle as, essentially, a Kurdish one, not a Syrian one. And the international community that is interested in unifying the Syrian opposition has failed to recognize how the psyche of the Kurdish minority is actually constraining Turkey’s continuing and indispensable involvement in the conflict.

And with no clear end in sight for Syria’s civil war, the international community cannot afford to continue wasting a precious opportunity. Erdogan himself recently expressed hope that a dialogue could be pursued between Ankara and Turkey’s Kurdish population. In what would have been unthinkable last year, he recently held discussions with one of Turkey’s best-known Kurdish parliamentarians and activists, Leyla Zana, who spent a decade in prison for speaking Kurdish. This was no coincidence, but it is also not enough.

Turkey should take steps that would help move toward a resolution of the Kurdish question, as a sign to Syria’s Kurds that Turkey and the international community are on the right side of history, unlike Bashar Assad. A first step can be the immediate enactment by the Erdogan government of its recently proposed plan to begin allowing instruction of the Kurdish language in privately funded schools.

At the same time, this summer the Turkish government should launch a delayed formal dialogue with Kurdish parliamentarians on the Kurdish question. This will have the added benefit of virtually guaranteeing stability in Turkish Kurdistan over the coming crucial months and years, while allowing Abdulbaset Sieda the potential to consolidate all of Syria’s ethnicities under his leadership.

Ali Ezzatyar is a lawyer and the executive director of the Berkeley Program on Entrepreneurship and Democracy in the Middle East. He wrote this commentary for THE DAILY STAR.



Read more: http://www.dailystar.com.lb/Opinion/Commentary/2012/Jul-06/179504-syrias-kurds-can-be-persuaded-to-revolt.ashx#ixzz1zn8bKqJs
(The Daily Star :: Lebanon News :: http://www.dailystar.com.lb

Defectors Recount Tales of Conflict; ‘Blood on My Hands’ #Syria

RAMTHA, JORDAN—Sitting among family in this Jordanian town on the Syrian border, an ex-army intelligence officer recounted how he worked against rebel forces by intimidating family members to prevent military defections.

Now he’s a defector.

Former Syrian Army military officers who defected trained new volunteers this month in Aleppo, Syria. Other defectors have left the country.

At the start of the Syrian revolution a year ago, the 21-year-old said he sat in his barracks with colleagues and watched TV reports of widespread protests against the government that met with increasingly brutal crackdowns. One day, he said, the TVs were removed and his commanders told him and his colleagues they were fighting against terrorists aligned with the U.S. and Israel who were plotting to overthrow President Bashar al-Assad.

The intelligence officer said he worked tirelessly to crush the uprising in western Homs for five months, finally being granted two days of leave in July. He returned to his home in southern Deraa but it was riddled with bullets. His brother had been arrested under the charge of “protesting” and his cousin killed by bullets fired by Syrian troops while demonstrating, he and his family members said in interviews.

The officer then realized he hadn’t been fighting terrorists, but his own people, he said.

“I have innocent blood on my hands,” he said, staring at the floor as his 3-year-old sister played beside him and his father and brother smoked cigarettes.

The intelligence officer was interviewed here in Ramtha, a poor city of whitewashed apartment buildings, and home to many of the 95,000 Syrian refugees that Jordan says have left Syria since the uprising began. Other defectors remain in Syria.

Many diplomats say the prospects are bleak for the opposition to topple Mr. Assad—who activists say continues his bloody crackdown even after a cease-fire began on Thursday—until more Syrian troops switch sides.

Analysts peg the number of defections at around 10,000 military members, out of about 304,000 active-duty troops.

This month several Gulf nations pledged to fund a pool of up to $40 million to pay defectors’ salaries and encourage them to turn their guns on the regime. But refugees say the fund—which hasn’t yet begun funding defectors—will have little chance of encouraging mass defections unless the international community can help secure the families of defected soldiers, police and security forces.

There are other reasons mass defections aren’t happening as fast as the opposition had hoped. These include the loyalty Mr. Assad enjoys from fellow Alawites, a minority Muslim sect in Syria, in the top levels of the government and military. Most of the defections come from the lower ranks, who are predominantly Sunni, members of Syria’s majority population.

Also, the military is structured in a way that limits communication among different units, heightening the challenge of coordinating against Mr. Assad, said Ayham Kamel, an analyst at the Eurasia Group.

“The funds from the Gulf represent a catalyst for broader defections, but they are unlikely to produce results overnight or even in a short period of time,” Mr. Kamel said. “And the bulk of ammunition and heavy weapons are held by units most loyal to the regime.”

Still, some soldiers have remained in service as undeclared rebels within the system, diplomats and several Syrian refugees interviewed in Jordan say. At great risk, these soldiers inform the opposition of the military’s movements and wave rebels through checkpoints.

Here in Ramtha, a former lieutenant colonel recounted his swift—and short-lived—decision to desert the Syrian police and join rebel forces.

“I fought until they locked up my father, interrogated my sisters and burned down my house,” said the former officer, while sitting on floor cushions with other refugees. “Now that I’m no longer fighting and left Syria, the pressure on my family is less.”

He declined to provide contact details for his family inside Syria out of concerns for their security, and his story, like those of some other refugees, couldn’t otherwise be corroborated.

Elsewhere in Ramtha, a former soldier who escaped to Irbid, Jordan, near the Syrian border, said his brother defected from the Syrian air force in April only to be caught and arrested. When their father went to the prison to inquire about the brother, he too was locked up, the soldier said.

The rest of the family is too scared to ask after the father and son, worried they too will be jailed, the former soldier said.

“No country is providing us weapons, Saudi and Qatar say they want to, but don’t,” said the former solider, 29 years old. “If the West doesn’t help us or other Arab countries, we’ll go to Al Qaeda. We don’t want to accept them, but what can we do when our children are being killed?”

The intelligence officer said he followed his father here in December after being stationed in western Homs province.

Worried, the intelligence officer would call his family in Deraa—a southern province where antiregime protests started early last year—asking if they were keeping safe from terrorist attacks. Concerned the phones were tapped, the intelligence officer’s family would respond vaguely and hurriedly hang up. “All I could think about was that I had to leave the army,” he said. “But I had to secure my family first.”

Meanwhile, the army intelligence officer’s Deraa experience embittered him to the Assad regime, and when he returned to Homs in July, he said he became an informant, telling rebels about military operations.

In December, he told his superiors that a family member was ill, and returned to Deraa. He then fled to Ramtha after securing his family, who now lives in a cramped three-room apartment there with his sister’s husband and small child.

He said that what especially haunts him is the intelligence he provided to colleagues to arrest defectors’ female family members, a way to pressure the former soldiers to turn themselves in. He said he heard reports of rape perpetrated by his colleagues as another form of intimidation against family members, but hadn’t seen any firsthand.

“I defected because of what I saw how they killed people, like my own cousin, and destroyed their houses,” he said. “I decided I couldn’t do this.”

Write to Maria Abi-Habib at maria.habib@dowjones.com