Implementation of General Assembly resolution 66/253 B on the situation in the Syrian Arab Republic - Report of the Secretary-General (A/66/889)

Introduction

  1. The present report is submitted in compliance with General Assembly resolution 66/253 B of 3 August 2012, in which the Secretary-General was requested to report to the Assembly, within 15 days, on the implementation of the resolution. The report provides an update on the implementation of the political, security, humanitarian and human rights aspects of the resolution during the period from 3 to 17 August.

  2. The overall situation in the Syrian Arab Republic continued to deteriorate during the reporting period, with the most intense fighting seen to date taking place in Aleppo. The Government of the Syrian Arab Republic and elements of the armed opposition continued to engage in violent confrontation. The Government remained convinced that it would be able to succeed militarily against the opposition and refused to engage in any political dialogue or move forward with the promised implementation of the six-point plan unless the opposition lay down arms. The armed opposition was equally convinced that its military efforts would succeed in toppling the leadership of the country and refused to accept the Government’s preconditions for dialogue. Temporary, localized reductions in troop strengths were seen in some areas although, in others, the conflict intensified. Armed opposition elements launched offensives in Aleppo and Damascus, while government forces maintained their use of heavy weapons in and around population centres and significantly increased the use of fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft in their operations.

  3. The humanitarian situation remained dire and continued to deteriorate as fighting in and around urban centres increased. The estimated number of internally displaced persons surpassed 1 million. As at 17 August, more than 170,000 Syrians had sought refuge across international borders. Such levels of internal and international displacement, against a backdrop of destruction of civilian infrastructure and residences in areas of origin, posed significant problems for many communities across the country. Both Government and opposition groups continued to commit gross human rights violations.

  4. International diplomatic efforts continued to lack unity and cohesion, despite some attempts to address the situation in the Syrian Arab Republic over the past few weeks. The Government of the Republic of Iran held a meeting of 30 nations on 9 August, and Saudi Arabia hosted a summit meeting of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation on 14 and 15 August.

United Nations envoy to Syria Lakhdar Brahimi walks off stage after addressing the U.N. General Assembly, Sept. 4, 2012.
U.N. finds wide consensus on Syria in
General Assembly, but remains
powerless as war worsens
(CBS News) UNITED NATIONS - With “acrimonious fault lines” between members blocking action by the United Nations Security Council on Syria’s escalating civil war, as a senior European put it to CBS News, the General Assembly came together Tuesday - for the second time - to shine a light on the issue and try to present a more unified front.
Diplomats accused both President Bashar Assad’s government and the opposition of violating human rights. They pointed to the recent report that more than 100,000 Syrians fled their country in August alone. They called on nations to meet the appeals for humanitarian aid.
In the end, however, and with great frustration, they threw up their hands. There is, after all, not much that the General Assembly can do.
The U.N.’s hopes for diplomacy now rest with seasoned Algerian diplomat Lakhdar Brahimi, the global body’s new envoy to Syria, who has taken over Kofi Annan’s role as negotiator-in-chief after the former U.N. secretary-general quit the position having accomplished little.
“The destruction is reaching catastrophic proportions,” Brahimi told the General Assembly’s 193 member nations. “The support of the international community is indispensable and very urgent.”
Brahimi’s pleas came two days after he told the BBC that his mission was “nearly impossible,” comparing it to standing in front of a brick wall and looking for tiny cracks - a loosely veiled reference to the “acrimonious fault lines” between the U.S. and other nations which believe Assad has lost all credibility as a leader, and Russia and China, which continue to block any external intervention - be it military or via further sanctions.
“As we gather in this great assembly today, millions of Syrians remain in a state of huge uncertainty, fear and death in their own country,” said current General Assembly President Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser of Qatar. “U.N. agencies now estimate that some 2.5 million Syrians are in urgent need of humanitarian assistance.”
In light of the stalemate in the Security Council, Al-Nasser beseeched the General Assembly to take action.
“The Charter places a responsibility on the General Assembly to take steps, where necessary, to promote and ensure international peace and security. This has become all the more necessary because of a deadlock and lack of unity in the Security Council.”
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon, meanwhile, said “regional leaders have a key role to play in creating the conditions conducive to a solution.”
His remarks came as The New York Times reported that, according to U.S. officials, Iran has resumed flying military equipment to the isolated Syrian regime via Iraq’s airspace - shipments which would violate U.N. sanctions already in place. Iraq has demanded the U.S. government provide proof of the shipments, saying the Iranians have told them the flights are carrying food and other humanitarian supplies.
“It is the time for the international community to close ranks and to send a united message to the Syrian parties to walk back from their military approach and to embrace the only path to bring about an end to the violence and a sustainable peaceful solution through an inclusive political process,” said Algeria’s U.N. ambassador Mourad Benmehidi.
If presenting a more united voice on the Syrian crisis was the goalpost for the General Assembly, then it did its part on Tuesday.
But the overwhelming majority view of the 193 nations will do nothing to alter the deadlock in the Security Council, or to improve the outlook for the thousands of Syrians suffering a brutal civil war.
This story was written by CBS News foreign affairs analyst Pamela Falk, edited by CBSNews.com foreign editor Tucker Reals

United Nations envoy to Syria Lakhdar Brahimi walks off stage after addressing the U.N. General Assembly, Sept. 4, 2012.

U.N. finds wide consensus on Syria in

General Assembly, but remains

powerless as war worsens

(CBS News) UNITED NATIONS - With “acrimonious fault lines” between members blocking action by the United Nations Security Council on Syria’s escalating civil war, as a senior European put it to CBS News, the General Assembly came together Tuesday - for the second time - to shine a light on the issue and try to present a more unified front.

Diplomats accused both President Bashar Assad’s government and the opposition of violating human rights. They pointed to the recent report that more than 100,000 Syrians fled their country in August alone. They called on nations to meet the appeals for humanitarian aid.

In the end, however, and with great frustration, they threw up their hands. There is, after all, not much that the General Assembly can do.

The U.N.’s hopes for diplomacy now rest with seasoned Algerian diplomat Lakhdar Brahimi, the global body’s new envoy to Syria, who has taken over Kofi Annan’s role as negotiator-in-chief after the former U.N. secretary-general quit the position having accomplished little.

“The destruction is reaching catastrophic proportions,” Brahimi told the General Assembly’s 193 member nations. “The support of the international community is indispensable and very urgent.”

Brahimi’s pleas came two days after he told the BBC that his mission was “nearly impossible,” comparing it to standing in front of a brick wall and looking for tiny cracks - a loosely veiled reference to the “acrimonious fault lines” between the U.S. and other nations which believe Assad has lost all credibility as a leader, and Russia and China, which continue to block any external intervention - be it military or via further sanctions.

“As we gather in this great assembly today, millions of Syrians remain in a state of huge uncertainty, fear and death in their own country,” said current General Assembly President Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser of Qatar. “U.N. agencies now estimate that some 2.5 million Syrians are in urgent need of humanitarian assistance.”

In light of the stalemate in the Security Council, Al-Nasser beseeched the General Assembly to take action.

“The Charter places a responsibility on the General Assembly to take steps, where necessary, to promote and ensure international peace and security. This has become all the more necessary because of a deadlock and lack of unity in the Security Council.”

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon, meanwhile, said “regional leaders have a key role to play in creating the conditions conducive to a solution.”

His remarks came as The New York Times reported that, according to U.S. officials, Iran has resumed flying military equipment to the isolated Syrian regime via Iraq’s airspace - shipments which would violate U.N. sanctions already in place. Iraq has demanded the U.S. government provide proof of the shipments, saying the Iranians have told them the flights are carrying food and other humanitarian supplies.

“It is the time for the international community to close ranks and to send a united message to the Syrian parties to walk back from their military approach and to embrace the only path to bring about an end to the violence and a sustainable peaceful solution through an inclusive political process,” said Algeria’s U.N. ambassador Mourad Benmehidi.

If presenting a more united voice on the Syrian crisis was the goalpost for the General Assembly, then it did its part on Tuesday.

But the overwhelming majority view of the 193 nations will do nothing to alter the deadlock in the Security Council, or to improve the outlook for the thousands of Syrians suffering a brutal civil war.

This story was written by CBS News foreign affairs analyst Pamela Falk, edited by CBSNews.com foreign editor Tucker Reals

Foreign Policy Experts Urge President Obama to Take Immediate Action in #Syria

Getty Images

Washington, D.C.—Fifty-six foreign policy experts and former U.S. government officials signed an open letter today urging President Obama to act more assertively to stop the Assad regime’s continuing atrocities against Syrian civilians.  Organized by the Foreign Policy Initiative and the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, the letter calls on the President to immediately establish safe zones and no-go zones within Syrian territory; establish contacts with the Free Syrian Army and provide a full range of direct assistance including self-defense aid; improve U.S. coordination with political opposition groups and provide them with secure communication technologies; and work with Congress to improve crippling U.S. and multilateral sanctions on the Syrian government.

For eleven months, the Syrian people have been dying on a daily basis at the hands of the Assad regime.  The letter urges that, “Given the United Nations Security Council’s recent failure to act…the United States cannot continue to defer its strategic and moral responsibilities in Syria to regional actors such as the Arab League, or to wait for consent from the Assad regime’s protectors, Russia and China.”

The letter calls on the President to lead on Syria. “Unless the United States takes the lead and acts, either individually or in concert with like-minded nations, thousands of additional Syrian civilians will likely die, and the emerging civil war in Syria will likely ignite wider instability in the Middle East.  Given American interests in the Middle East, as well as the implications for those seeking freedom in other repressive societies, it is imperative that the United States and its allies not remove any option from consideration, including military intervention.’”

The full text of the letter and signatories can be found below.


February 17, 2012

 
The Honorable Barack H. Obama
President of the United States of America
The White House
Washington, D.C.
 
Dear Mr. President:
 
For eleven months now, the Syrian people have been dying on a daily basis at the hands of their government as they seek to topple the brutal regime of Bashar al-Assad.  As the recent events in the city of Homs—in which hundreds of Syrians have been killed in a matter of days—have shown, Assad will stop at nothing to maintain his grip on power.
 
Given the United Nations Security Council’s recent failure to act, we believe that the United States cannot continue to defer its strategic and moral responsibilities in Syria to regional actors such as the Arab League, or to wait for consent from the Assad regime’s protectors, Russia and China.  We therefore urge you to take immediate steps to decisively halt the Assad regime’s atrocities against Syrian civilians, and to hasten the emergence of a post-Assad government in Syria.
 
Syria’s future is not purely a humanitarian concern.  The Assad regime poses a grave threat to national security interests of the United States.  The Syrian government, which has been on the State Department’s State Sponsors of Terrorism list since 1979, maintains a strategic partnership with the terror-sponsoring government of Iran, as well as with Hamas and Hezbollah.  For years, it facilitated the entry of foreign fighters into Iraq who killed American troops.  For years, it secretly pursued a nuclear program with North Korea’s assistance.  And for decades, it has closely cooperated with Iran and other agents of violence and instability to menace America’s allies and partners throughout the Middle East.
 
Equally troubling, foreign powers have already directly intervened in Syria—in support of the Assad regime.  Russia is providing arms and supplies to the Syrian government.  Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and Hezbollah are reportedly operating in Syria, and assisting Syrian military forces and pro-regime militias in efforts to crush the Syrian opposition.  In turn, the lack of resolve and action by the responsible members of the international community is only further emboldening the Assad regime.
 
Given these facts, we urge you to take the following immediate actions to hasten an end to the Assad regime and the humanitarian catastrophe that it is inflicting on the Syrian people:

  • Immediately establish safe zones within Syrian territory, as well as no-go zones for the Assad regime’s military and security forces, around Homs, Idlib, and other threatened areas, in order to protect Syrian civilians.  To the extent possible, the United States should work with like-minded countries like Turkey and members of the Arab League in these efforts.
  • Establish contacts with the Free Syrian Army (FSA) and, in conjunction with allies in the Middle East and Europe, provide a full range of direct assistance, including self-defense aid to the FSA.
  • Improve U.S. coordination with political opposition groups and provide them with secure communications technologies and other assistance that will help to improve their ability to prepare for a post-Assad Syria.
  • Work with Congress to impose crippling U.S. and multilateral sanctions on the Syrian government, especially on Syria’s energy, banking, and shipping sectors.

Unless the United States takes the lead and acts, either individually or in concert with like-minded nations, thousands of additional Syrian civilians will likely die, and the emerging civil war in Syria will likely ignite wider instability in the Middle East.  Given American interests in the Middle East, as well as the implications for those seeking freedom in other repressive societies, it is imperative that the United States and its allies not remove any option from consideration, including military intervention.

The Syrian people are asking for international assistance.  It is apparent that American leadership is required to ensure the quickest end to the Assad regime’s brutal reign, and to clearly show the Syrian people that, as you said on February 4, 2012, the people of the free world stand with them as they seek to realize their aspirations.

Sincerely,


Khairi AbazaJohn P. HannahJohn Podhoretz
Ammar AbdulhamidWilliam InbodenStephen Rademaker
Hussain Abdul-HussainBruce Pitcairn JacksonKarl Rove
Tony BadranAsh JainJonathan Schanzer
Paul BermanKenneth JensenRandy Scheunemann
Max BootAllison JohnsonGary J. Schmitt
Ellen BorkSirwan KajjoDaniel S. Senor
L. Paul BremerLawrence F. Kaplan Lee Smith
Matthew R. J. BrodskyIrina KrasovskayaHenry D. Sokolski
Elizabeth CheneyWilliam KristolDaniel Twining
Seth CropseyMichael LedeenPeter Wehner
Toby DershowitzTod LindbergKenneth R. Weinstein
James DentonHerbert I. LondonLeon Wieseltier
Mark DubowitzClifford D. MayR. James Woolsey
Nicholas EberstadtAnn MarloweKhawla Yusuf
Eric S. EdelmanRobert C. McFarlaneDov S. Zakheim
Jamie M. FlyJoshua MuravchikRobert Zarate
Reuel Marc GerechtMartin PeretzRadwan Ziadeh
Abe GreenwaldDanielle Pletka
#Syria Can you judge a nation by the company it keeps? Syria’s thuggish coalition shows how evil this regime is

The Western calls for intervention in Syria are gathering

The Western calls for intervention in Syria are gathering

Now here’s a nice coalition of the willing for you: Belarus, Bolivia, China, Cuba, North Korea, Ecuador, Iran, Nicaragua, Russia, Venezuela, Zimbabwe.

Those are the countries that voted “no” on a UN General Assembly resolution, modeled on the Arab League initiative, which called on Bashar al-Assad to resign and the Syrian army to remove all its tanks and heavy artillery from residential streets.

So at least we’re now clear as to which parties intend to lead the way toward a global re-normalisation of relations with Damascus: three zombified Stalinist regimes, a corporatist mafia state run by a botoxed and whale-harpooning KGB agent, an Islamic dictatorship looking to build a nuclear bomb, a kleptocratic African despot, and a moon-facedcaudillo who blames his prostate cancer on the CIA.

So far, the French have been the ones pushing the issue on Syria. Months ago, Alain Juppe was the first Western statesman to moot the idea of a “humanitarian corridor” into the country to allow food, medicine and supplies to be brought the battered civilian population. When pressed by French reporters what exactly such a corridor would entail and whether or not supply lines would necessitate armed escort – Red Crescent trucks are routinely attacked by the Assad regime in Syria – Juppe admitted that it would in fact amount to military intervention.  Nevertheless, such a corridor is on offer again in the form of a proposed French draft of a new UN Security Council resolution on Syria. David Cameron, meanwhile, has offered to provide £2 million in aid to Syria, yet has declined to say which parties will receive this largess and how it will be smuggled into the country. He may soon face a Juppe-style questioning about both.

What we’re seeing emerge, in other words, is intervention-creep. As I’ve argued before, it’s inevitable that foreign firepower will be come to Syria because time can only lead to two outcomes that are inextricably intertwined: further crimes against humanity committed by the Assad regime and that regime’s catastrophic implosion. There is no going back from this point, and those who argue against intervention would do well to admit this basic fact.

Also, all the warnings advanced by anti-interventionists  – the rise of sectarianism, regional instability, the proliferation of jihadism – will come to pass in Syria (and are already beginning to) without the benefit of intervention. A failed state that borders Iraq, Turkey, Lebanon, Israel and Jordan is not something even US foreign policy realists can stomach.

As for current US policy, this seems to be winding down all diplomatic engines in a desperate attempt to do something. The other day Hillary Clinton got up alongside Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu and said that in order to dispatch a UN-Arab peacekeeping force to Syria, she’d first need to gain the permission of… Bashar al-Assad: “[T]he peacekeeping request is one that will take agreement and consensus,” Clinton said. “So we don’t know that it is going to be possible to persuade Syria. They’ve already, as of today, rejected that.”

Legally, she’s correct. But to Syrians, this sounds pathetic: the equivalent of seeing a man set on fire and, rather than running to grab a bucket of water, asking the arsonist to sign an affidavit first.

Also, the US strategy is not helped by intense speculation, grounded in no discernible evidence, that that al-Qaeda is not only already in Syria but setting things off. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told Congress this week that recent bombings in Damascus and Aleppo bore “all the earmarks of an al-Qaeda-like attack.” I think Director Clapper means to say “hallmarks,” but then, I stopped trying to parse his semantics after he claimed a year ago that the Muslim Brotherhood is a “largely secular” movement in Egypt.

Clapper does have a point, however. Homegrown or imported jihadism will almost certainly have the next at-bat against the Syrian people. Why? Because when you’ve already withstood Russian tanks, Iranian and Hezbollah snipers and your own psychopathic princeling’s war machine, you clearly haven’t suffered enough yet.

Syrians brave backlash to rally against Assad #Syria

The protesters emerged from mosques after the main weekly Muslim prayers, including in Damascus, following a call by Internet-based activists for a rally for a “new phase of popular resistance.”

“We want revenge against Bashar and Maher,” they chanted at gatherings across the country, according to videos posted on YouTube, referring to the president’s brother, who heads the feared Fourth Armoured Division.

They turned out after the UN General Assembly overwhelmingly backed an Arab League initiative calling on Assad to step aside, and ahead of a visit by a Chinese envoy pushing for peace.

Assad, in remarks to visiting Mauritanian Prime Minister Moulaye Ould Mohamed Laghdaf, said reforms have to be synchronised with a “return to peace” in the country torn apart by violence.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said 12 people were killed so far on Friday, one of them at a demonstration that was fired upon in the capital.

At least 10,000 people demonstrated in the southern town of Dael, in Daraa province, cradle of the 11-month revolt inspired by the Arab Spring, said the Britain-based monitor.

In Homs, rockets crashed into strongholds of resistance at the rate of four a minute, according to one opposition activist who warned the city was facing a humanitarian crisis.

“It’s the most violent in 14 days. It’s unbelievable - extreme violence the like of which we have never seen before,” said Hadi Abdullah of the General Commission of the Syrian Revolution.

“There are thousands of people isolated in Homs … There are neighbourhoods that we know nothing about. I myself do not know if my parents are okay. I have had no news from them for 14 days,” he told AFP by phone.

“The regime troops are still shelling… but are reluctant to enter Baba Amr. They are on the periphery and are moving slowly. The army will lose if it begins urban warfare,” activist Omar Shakir said later on Skype.

Rights groups estimated the two-week assault on Homs has killed almost 400 people, and a medic reached on Skype said 1,800 have been wounded.

The violence came after the UN General Assembly demanded on Thursday an immediate halt to Syria’s brutal crackdown on dissent, which human rights groups say has cost more than 6,000 lives since March last year.

Russia, China and Iran opposed the non-binding resolution. The vote came just days after Beijing and Moscow vetoed a similar resolution at the UN Security Council.

Such a strong vote in favour of the resolution adds to mounting pressure on Assad to curb a crackdown that left at least 41 people dead on Thursday as security forces bore down on focal points of dissent.

Syrian envoy Bashar Jaafari lashed out at other Arab nations, saying Western powers had exploited the Arab League to “internationalise” the crisis.

“The Arab Trojan horse has been unmasked today,” he said.

Iran’s UN representative, Mohammad Khazaee, warned that the resolution would only deepen the crisis, “with all its ramifications to the region as a whole.”

On the eve of his trip to Damascus, Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Zhai Jun said that Beijing opposed armed intervention and forced “regime change” in Syria.

Nato Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said the Western alliance had no intention of intervening in Syria even in the event of a UN mandate to protect civilians, and urged Middle East countries to find a way to end the spiralling violence.

Rasmussen told Reuters on Friday he also rejected the possibility of providing logistical support for proposed “humanitarian corridors” to ferry relief to towns and cities bearing the brunt of Assad’s crackdown on pro-democracy protesters.

Asked if Nato’s stance would change if the United Nations provided a mandate, Mr Rasmussen was doubtful.

“No, I don’t think so because Syria is also a differrent society, it is much more complicated ethnically, politically, religiously. That’s why I do believe that a regional solution should be found,” he said.

France and Britain echoed Mr Rasmussen’s comments on Friday.

Meeting for a summit in Paris, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and British Prime Minister David Cameron expressed support for a conference to form an international coalition dubbed the Friends of Syria next week in Tunis.

“We cannot accept that a dictator massacre his own people, but the revolution will not be brought from outside, it will rise from inside Syria, as it has done elsewhere,” Mr Sarkozy told a joint news conference.

“What is happening in Syria is appalling, for the government to be butchering and murdering its own people,” Mr Cameron said.

On Thursday, Syria’s opposition rejected a newly drafted constitution that could end nearly five decades of Baath Party rule, and urged voters to boycott a February 26 referendum on the charter.

One of them, the National Coordination Committee for Democratic Change, told AFP “it is impossible for us to take part in this referendum before a stop to the violence and killings.”

Source: AFP and Reuters

Syrian attacks continue as U.N. set for vote #Syria

In this Feb. 15, 2012 citizen journalism image provided by the Local Coordination Committees in Syria and accessed on Thursday, Feb. 16, 2012, flames leap the air from a car and building bombed by the Syrian government forces shelling, in Baba Amr neighborhood in Homs province, central Syria. (AP Photo/Local Coordination Committees in Syria)

16/02/12 (CBS/AP)  

BEIRUT - U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon accused the Syrian regime of potential crimes against humanity Thursday as activists reported fresh violence in Daraa, the city where the uprising against President Bashar Assad erupted 11 months ago.

Speaking to reporters in Vienna, Ban demanded the Syrian regime stop using indiscriminate force against civilians caught up in fighting between government troops and Assad’s opponents.

“We see neighborhoods shelled indiscriminately, hospitals used as torture centers, children as young as 10 years old chained and abused,” Ban told reporters in Vienna. “We see almost a certain crime against humanity.”

Syrian activists said government forces attacked Daraa on Thursday, carrying out arrests and shooting randomly in the city seen as the birthplace of the uprising.

U.S. signals concern Iran, Russia arming Syria
U.S.: Syria constitution referendum “laughable”
Russia continues to shield Assad at U.N.

The push into Daraa, located near the Jordanian border some 80 miles south of Damascus, follows sieges on the rebellious cities of Homs and Hama and appears to be part of an effort by the regime to extinguish major pockets of dissent.

The U.N. General Assembly scheduled a vote for Thursday on an Arab-sponsored resolution strongly condemning human rights violations by the Syrian regime and backing an Arab League plan aimed at ending the conflict.

Assembly spokeswoman Nihal Saad said Wednesday that the vote will take place Thursday afternoon. There are no vetoes in the 193-member world body and U.N. diplomats said the resolution, which already has 60 co-sponsors, is virtually certain to be approved.

“Although the U.N.’s 193 member General Assembly has no power to enforce a resolution, the importance of the demands on Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad to withdraw his armed forces from cities, stop the violence, and to begin a political transition to democracy, has the impact of bolstering the Arab-led effort to resolve the crisis, and isolates Russia and China for blocking Security Council action to send a peacekeeping force,” CBS News foreign affairs analyst Pam Falk reports.

On Wednesday, Assad ordered a Feb. 26 referendum on a new constitution that would create a multiparty system in Syria, which has been ruled by the same family dynasty for 40 years. Such a change would have been unheard of a year ago, and Assad’s regime is touting the new constitution as the centerpiece of reforms aimed at calming Syria’s upheaval.

But after almost a year of bloodshed, with well over 5,400 dead in the regime’s crackdown on protesters and rebels, Assad’s opponents say the referendum and other promises of reform are not enough and that the country’s strongman must go.

Assad’s call for a referendum also raises the question of how a nationwide vote could be held at a time when many areas see daily battles between Syrian troops and rebel soldiers.

The U.S. dismissed the referendum move as an empty gesture.

Assad “knows what he needs to do if he really cares about his people,” U.S. State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland told reporters in Washington on Wednesday. “The violence just needs to come to an end, and he needs to get out of the way so we can have a democratic transition.”

Syria: White House labels Assad’s referendum promise ‘laughable’

Opposition leaders immediately rejected the offer to hold a vote on a new constitution on Feb 26 followed by multi-party elections within 90 days.

The White House dismissed the referendum as “laughable”. “It makes a mockery of the Syrian revolution,” said Jay Carney, the White House spokesman.

At the United Nations in New York, where there were renewed attempts to unite international opinion against the regime, Mr Assad’s pledge was dismissed as “hot air”.

The UN General Assembly will vote tonight on a motion supporting a plan by the Arab League to send a joint peacekeeping force to help end the 11-month conflict, in which at least 6,000 people have been killed.

The vote is not legally binding but British officials said that if significant numbers of countries voted in favour, it would increase pressure on Russia and China, both of which vetoed a UN Security Council resolution backing the Arab League plan. The league proposal called for Mr Assad’s departure within months.

Asked about the possibility of elections in Syria, one senior British official said: “We’re not taking it too seriously. Assad has said a lot of hot air in the past.”

France suggested that a new, binding Security Council resolution could be put to the vote as soon as next week.

Alain Juppé, the French foreign minister, said he would work with Russia to agree on a form of words it could accept and added that the resolution could involve the creation of “humanitarian corridors” to allow peacekeepers access to civilians caught up in the violence.

Moscow has insisted that it will back international moves to end the crisis only if both the Syrian government and opposition are required to commit to a ceasefire — a demand which Western powers including Britain, the United States and France say gives legitimacy to the violent crackdown by the Assad regime.

Mr Assad responded to growing international outrage at his bloody crackdown by offering to stage a referendum on a new constitution that could effectively end five decades of single-party rule. The proposed charter would drop Article 8 of the Syrian constitution which declares the ruling Ba’ath Party as the “leader of the state and society”.

An explosion hit a major oil pipeline feeding a refinery in Homs, sending a large plume of smoke rising into the sky (Reuters)

Under the new constitution, freedom would be “a sacred right” and “the people will govern the people” in a multi-party democracy, state television said.

The referendum would be followed by elections to appoint a new president who could serve for up to two terms of seven years each. Mr Assad has been in power for 12 years, succeeding his father, who ruled for 29 years. The Ba’ath Party has ruled Syria since 1963.

He made clear, however, that the onslaught against rebels would continue. A new offensive was launched in the town of Hama, while the besieged city of Homs was shelled for the 13th day in a row. In the capital Damascus, troops carried out a search and arrest operation.

Syrian television quoted a draft of the referendum: “The political system of the state will be based on a principle of political plurality and democracy will be practised through the voting box.”

New parties could not be based on a religion or regional interests, meaning the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood and autonomy-seeking Kurdish parties would be excluded from participating.

Melhem al-Droubi, a member of the exiled opposition Syrian National Council and the Muslim Brotherhood, rejected the proposal. “The truth is that Bashar al-Assad has increased the killing and slaughter in Syria,” he said. “He has lost his legitimacy and we aren’t interested in his rotten constitutions, old or new.”

Hundreds of people have been killed in the bombardment of Homs. Activists and aid groups have warned of a growing humanitarian crisis, with food running short and wounded people unable to get proper care.

#Syria draft resolution heads to UN General Assembly